{"id":103,"date":"2023-04-14T12:38:04","date_gmt":"2023-04-14T17:38:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/csalateral.org\/ccrrrc\/?page_id=103"},"modified":"2024-09-17T18:58:23","modified_gmt":"2024-09-17T23:58:23","slug":"east-asia","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/csalateral.org\/ccrrrc\/east-asia\/","title":{"rendered":"East Asia"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\n
\"Two<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

It is still widely believed that race and racism are not relevant to East Asia because of its perceived ethnic homogeneity. Yet race-based or ethnocentric violence\u2014both physical and symbolic\u2014are not only part of the social fabric in contemporary East Asia, but also rooted in the region\u2019s modern history. On the other hand, complex issues of local politics and discrimination across East Asia are often flattened out in the eyes of Euro-American observers, who try to make sense of the local ethnoracial politics according to the Western racial hierarchy. Thus, the East Asia Regional Section aims to tackle this difficult question: How do we talk about race in the first place, when race is not considered a significant part of East Asian cultures?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Addressing this question at their cores, essays in the East Asian Regional Section collectively explore translatability of race and racism as they grapple with the historical particularity of Japan, Korea, and China, which has produced a wide range of ethnonationalist issues since the early twentieth century. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

While the terms \u201crace\u201d and \u201cracism\u201d were initially a Western import to East Asia, homegrown ethnocentrism and colorisms (cognizant of the fact that \u201ccolorism\u201d has developed in more than a single form and logic across different cultures and regions) have both complicated as well as intersected with the Westerncentric global racial hierarchy. On the one hand, the modern political turmoil, ideological conflicts, and economic restructuring in the region including Japanese colonialism, the Cold War, diasporas, and postcolonial nationalism, have shaped the regional ethno-racial politics distinct from Euro-American racism and anti-Blackness. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

This urgently calls for a need to theorize the knowledge production of race and ethnicity in East Asia, which decenters the extant Westerncentric scholarship on the constructions of race and racism. On the other hand, more and more emerging contemporary transnational issues across East Asia such as Islamophobia, anti- refugee sentiment, cultural appropriation of Blackness, and violence against migrants, especially from the Global South, also necessitate a dialogue between local anti-racist discourses and global initiatives to combat racism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Essays<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Aiming to provide the readers with an opportunity to start these much-needed conversations, the East Asia section features four essays. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

On racial politics and the African diaspora in China, Kudus Adebayo shares his insights based on his experiences of observing and living in China as an African diasporic person. These essays engage with a wide range of cultural constructions of race and racism, while recognizing how they intersect with global colorisms and anti-Blackness in a broader context.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The South Korean contributor, Park Kyungjoo, connects anti-refugee sentiment and racism in South Korea based on his refugee rights activism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Finally, two contributors based in Japan explore (in)visibility of racism: Fujii Hikaru, a visual artist, walks the readers through his works, which interrogate how Japanese imperialism adopted the Westerncentric racialized gaze at colonized Asian minorities. Ryang Yong- song, the second contributor, asks whether it would be possible to understand far-right violence against the Zainichi (state-less diasporic citizens of Korean descent living in Japan) as a form of racism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t