Marx famously argued that labor, under capitalism, alienates humans from not only the products of their labor, but from their very nature. Further, capitalist labor presents a “double freedom” for the worker that is, of course, anything but free: the freedom to either work for an exploitive boss, or to refuse, and starve. UBI would seemingly allow for way out of such a conundrum, but would it also open the door to allow humanity to regain their status as “species-beings”? I explore the idea of UBI as presenting an opportunity for meaningful work and a subversion of the logic of capital. Does UBI indeed grant workers more freedom, or does it merely contribute to the continued denigration of social relations under capital?
Articles by Kimberly Klinger
Kimberly Klinger received her PhD from the Cultural Studies program at George Mason University in 2016. She received her Bachelors from Penn State University, majoring in Letters, Arts, and Sciences; and her Masters from George Washington University in Women's Studies with a focus on Media Theory. Kimberly lives and works in Washington, DC, and has taught at George Mason University and the University of Maryland, Baltimore County.